ReviewPlant molecular biology2024
Decoding the plant clock: a review of mathematical models for the circadian regulatory network.
Review in Plant molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most organisms have evolved specific mechanisms to respond to changes in environmental conditions such as light and temperature over the course of day. These periodic changes in the physiology and behaviour of organisms, referred to as circadian rhythms, are a consequence of intricate molecular mechanisms in the form of transcription and translational feedback loops. The plant circadian regulatory network is a complex web of interconnected feedback loops involving various transcription factors such as CCA1, LHY, PRRs, TOC1, LUX, ELF3, ELF4, RVE8, and more. This network enables plants to adapt and thrive in diverse environmental conditions. It responds to entrainment signals, including light, temperature, and nutrient concentrations and interacts with most of the physiological functions such as flowering, growth and stress response. Mathematical modelling of these gene regulatory networks enables a deeper understanding of not only the function but also the perturbations that may affect the plant growth and function with changing climate. Over the years, numerous mathematical models have been developed to understand the diverse aspects of plant circadian regulation. In this review, we have delved into the systematic development of these models, outlining the model components and refinements over time. We have also highlighted strengths and limitations of each of the models developed so far. Finally, we conclude the review by describing the prospects for investigation and advancement of these models for better understanding of plant circadian regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39207587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.