ArticleDiscover oncology2024
An observational study on the efficacy of targeted therapy for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic characterization of pulmonary sarcomatoid adenocarcinoma: a paired whole-exome sequencing study of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The pathogenesis and therapeutic management of rare pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma Clinically Diagnosed Using Small Biopsy Specimens.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare tumor that is resistant to cytotoxic agents. This observational study aimed to evaluate the detection rate of driver gene alteration and the efficacy of targeted therapy for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.
methodsWe established a database of patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and their clinical information, including EGFR mutation, ALK fusion gene, ROS1 fusion gene, BRAF mutation, and MET exon 14 skipping mutation. The present study retrieved and analyzed the data of patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in whom driver gene alterations were evaluated, and the survival duration after the initiation of treatment with targeted therapy was examined.
resultsA total of 44 patients were included in the present study. The EGFR mutation, ALK fusion gene, and MET exon 14 skipping mutation were detected in 2/43 patients (4.7%), 2/34 patients (5.9%), and 2/16 patients (12.5%), respectively. The ROS1 fusion gene (0/18 patients) and BRAF mutation (0/15 patients) were not detected. Female patients (P = 0.063, Fisher's exact test) and patients without smoking history (P = 0.025, Fisher's exact test) were the dominant groups in which any driver mutation was detected. Five patients with driver gene alterations were treated with targeted therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.3 months and 1.6 months in 2 of the patients treated with gefitinib. Two patients with the ALK fusion gene showed 2.1 and 14.0 months of PFS from the initiation of treatment with crizotinib, and a patient with the MET exon 14 skipping mutation showed 9.7 months of PFS from the initiation of treatment with tepotinib.
conclusionThe EGFR mutation, ALK fusion gene, and MET exon 14 skipping mutation were detected in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in clinical practice, and some patients achieved long survival times after receiving targeted therapy. Further investigation is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of targeted therapy for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.