ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024
The effect of using synthetic vs. biological dural substitutes during prenatal and postnatal repair of spina bifida on spinal cord tethering-a review of literature.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fetoscopic two-layer closure for open neural tube defects: prospective study of obstetric, surgical and perinatal outcomes in the first 50 cases.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spina bifida is a congenital neural tube closure defect, with myelomeningocele being the most clinically significant open neural tube defect occurring in one in 1000 births worldwide as reported by Phillips LA et al. (Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 47(7):173-177, 2017) and Zerah M and Kulkarni AV (Handb Clin Neurol 112:975-991, 2013). With advances in fetal surgery, this condition can be corrected in utero. Despite such precision surgery, many complications may still arise, with consequent spinal cord tethering being a major one. When the roots of the spinal cord adhere to the spinal canal instead of floating freely within the dural sleeve within the canal, it is termed as "tethering" as discussed by Martínez-Lage JF et al. (Neurocirugia (Astur) 18(4):312-319, 2007). Tethering has a variety of complications, which are best avoided by analyzing the outcomes of the different dural substitutes and improving surgical techniques. This literature review evaluates the use of different dural substitutes in fetal and postnatal surgery, with their effects on spinal cord tethering. Finding a significant difference in spinal cord adherence outcomes between these two groups can help one introspect on the impact of ideal surgical techniques to be implemented, thus reducing subsequent tethering and other future surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39207528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.