Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39207476›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Pancreatic cystic neoplasms].

Maximilian Brunner, Robert Grützmann

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilian BrunnerKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Robert GrützmannKlink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. Robert.Gruetzmann@uk-erlangen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic lesions represent a challenging heterogeneous entity with a potential risk of malignant transformation. The diagnostics include in particular medical history taking with collection of relevant clinical information and high-resolution imaging, preferably using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography. A differentiation between different cystic entities and identification of risk factors are crucial for making appropriate treatment decisions. Only a small proportion of pancreatic cystic neoplasms require surgery. Pancreatic cystic lesions with a relevant risk of malignancy, such as main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) and general cystic pancreatic lesions with risk factors regardless of the entity, should be resected, whereas an individualized approach is required for branch duct IPMN and serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) and dysontogenetic cysts require no treatment. Parenchyma-sparing and minimally invasive resection techniques should be preferred whenever possible for resecting pancreatic cystic tumors. Approximately 10% of patients develop recurrences over time.

Indexed as

Pancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceDiagnosis, DifferentialEndosonographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatectomyPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsDiagnosticsIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmPancreatic cystic neoplasmPancreatic cystsPancreatic surgeryTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.