Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39207469›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Novel systemic treatment options for advanced bladder cancer].

C Aydogdu, I Brinkmann, J Casuscelli

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C AydogduUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
I BrinkmannUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
J CasuscelliUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. jozefina.casuscelli@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder requires complex approaches and is constantly evolving. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy remains the current standard of care for muscle-invasive advanced bladder cancer. For patients ineligible for cisplatin, adjuvant treatment with nivolumab is recommended. Innovative perioperative combinations could transform the treatment landscape in the future. First-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has long been dominated by platinum-based combinations, recently followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitor avelumab as maintenance therapy; however, recent results on the use of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in the first-line setting are expected to fundamentally change the treatment options. In subsequent lines of treatment, the not yet approved erdafitinib, as the first targeted therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma, offers an important alternative and underscores the need for molecular testing.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinCystectomyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingNivolumabPyrazolesQuinoxalinesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsavelumabCisplatinenfortumab vedotinerdafitinibImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabpembrolizumabPyrazolesQuinoxalinesAntibody-drug conjugatesNeoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapyNovel first-line combinationsTargeted therapyUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.