Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39207040›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2024

Follow-up of patients with chronic conditions within primary care practices during COVID-19: Results from 7 Central and Eastern-European countries from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study.

Giulia Delvento, Christian Schindler, Cristina Rotaru, Ala Curteanu, Ghenadie Curochicin, Helen Prytherch, Victoria Tkachenko, Bohumil Seifert, Peter Torzsa, Radost Asenova and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giulia DelventoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-0669
Christian SchindlerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Cristina RotaruHealthy Life Project, Reducing the Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in Moldova, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Chișinău, Moldova.ORCID 0000-0003-2726-587X
Ala CurteanuHealthy Life Project, Reducing the Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in Moldova, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Chișinău, Moldova.
Ghenadie CurochicinDepartment of Family Medicine, Nicolae Testemitanu, Chișinău, Moldova.
Helen PrytherchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6999-5718
Victoria TkachenkoDepartment of Family Medicine, Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-0789-5340
Bohumil SeifertInstitute of General Practice, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Peter TorzsaDepartment of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8148-4961
Radost AsenovaDepartment of General Medicine, Plovdiv University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Carmen BusneagDepartment of Kinetic Therapy and Special Motricity, Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania.
Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9844-8935
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-7785
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1092-945X
Claire CollinsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-5159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic posed severe challenges to delivery of services at Primary Care level and for achieving follow-up of patients with chronic diseases.

objectivesWe analysed data from the PRICOV-19 study to explore determinants of active follow-up for chronic disease patients in seven Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries during the pandemic.

methodsPricov-19 was a cross-sectional study conducted within PC (Primary Care) practices in 37 European countries. We analysed data from 7 CEE countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Moldova, Romania, Ukraine) collected between November 2020 and December 2021. Practices were recruited through random or convenience sampling and participation of practices was voluntary. We performed descriptive statistics to identify the level of follow-up of chronic disease and what health system and practice-specific factors were associated with better follow-up. We used logistic regression and meta-analysis techniques to explore associations and heterogeneity between countries.

results67.8% out of 978 practices reported actively following up chronic patients. Positive associations were found between active follow-up and such as having more GPs (aOR = 1.18, p-value = 0.005), an above-average chronic patient population (aOR = 3.13, p-value = 0.006), adequate government support (aOR = 2.35, p-value = 0.001), and GPs having time for guideline reading (aOR = 0.008, p-value = 1.71).

conclusionsPatient follow-up, was influenced by different health system and practice-specific factors. The implications suggest the need for government support to enhance PC practice organisation during crises and solutions to decrease GP workload and provide tailored care for patients with chronic disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19Primary Health CareChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeEurope, EasternHumansCOVID-19multi-countryoutreachPatient follow-upquality of care

Identifiers

PMID39207040
PMCPMC11363735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.