Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206846›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

From Static to Dynamic Structures: Improving Binding Affinity Prediction with Graph-Based Deep Learning.

Yaosen Min, Ye Wei, Peizhuo Wang, Xiaoting Wang, Han Li, Nian Wu, Stefan Bauer, Shuxin Zheng, Yu Shi, Yingheng Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In Silico Screening of Secondary Metabolites from Scorodocarpus Borneensis as Hepatitis B Virus Inhibitors.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yaosen MinInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4741-6188
Ye WeiInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Peizhuo WangInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xiaoting WangSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Han LiInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Nian WuInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Stefan BauerDepartment of Intelligent Systems, KTH, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden.
Shuxin ZhengMicrosoft Research Asia, Beijing, 100080, China.
Yu ShiMicrosoft Research Asia, Beijing, 100080, China.
Yingheng WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Ji WuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Dan ZhaoInstitute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Jianyang ZengSchool of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, 310030, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0950-7716

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF1201300National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270640National Natural Science Foundation of China T2125007"Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zheilang 2024SSYS0036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities is an essential challenge in structure-based drug design. Despite recent advances in data-driven methods for affinity prediction, their accuracy is still limited, partially because they only take advantage of static crystal structures while the actual binding affinities are generally determined by the thermodynamic ensembles between proteins and ligands. One effective way to approximate such a thermodynamic ensemble is to use molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Here, an MD dataset containing 3,218 different protein-ligand complexes is curated, and Dynaformer, a graph-based deep learning model is further developed to predict the binding affinities by learning the geometric characteristics of the protein-ligand interactions from the MD trajectories. In silico experiments demonstrated that the model exhibits state-of-the-art scoring and ranking power on the CASF-2016 benchmark dataset, outperforming the methods hitherto reported. Moreover, in a virtual screening on heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) using Dynaformer, 20 candidates are identified and their binding affinities are further experimentally validated. Dynaformer displayed promising results in virtual drug screening, revealing 12 hit compounds (two are in the submicromolar range), including several novel scaffolds. Overall, these results demonstrated that the approach offer a promising avenue for accelerating the early drug discovery process.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingDrug DesignHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsProteinsThermodynamicsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsProteinsbinding affinitydrug discoverygraph transformermolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39206846
PMCPMC11516055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.