Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206771›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2024

High-powered 675-nm laser: Safety and efficacy in clinical evaluation and in vitro evidence for different skin disorders.

Massimo D F Vitale, Francesca Madeddu, Irene Fusco, Laura Pieri, Paolo Bonan, Tiziano Zingoni, Giada Magni, Francesca Rossi

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-powered 675-nm laser: Safety and efficacy in clinical evaluation and in vitro evidence for different skin disorders.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Massimo D F VitalePolyclinic of San Domenico, Private Practice, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca MadedduEl.En. Group, Calenzano, Italy.
Irene FuscoEl.En. Group, Calenzano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-8808
Laura PieriEl.En. Group, Calenzano, Italy.
Paolo BonanLaser Cutaneous Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery Unit, Villa Donatello Clinic, Florence, Italy.
Tiziano ZingoniEl.En. Group, Calenzano, Italy.
Giada MagniCnr - Istituto di Fisica Applicata "Nello Carrara", Via Madonna del Piano, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-9150
Francesca RossiCnr - Istituto di Fisica Applicata "Nello Carrara", Via Madonna del Piano, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaser technology is a viable therapeutic option for treating a number of skin pathologic conditions, including pigmented lesions, vascular lesions and acne scars.

aimIn this work, through in vitro and clinical investigations we test the efficacy, the safety and the speed of treatment of high-powered laser system emitting a 675-nm in the management of various skin condition. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn vitro experiments were performed irradiating adult human dermal fibroblasts cells (HDFa) with 675-nm laser for 24, 48 and 72 h with different fluences and Ki-67

resultsThe application of the high-power 675 nm laser has proven effective in stimulating cell proliferation in in vitro experiments and it led to good results for all skin pathologies. GAIS showed values between 3 and 4 points for all treated pathologies, all scores between '75%-good improvements' and '100%-excellent improvements'. The treatment time was reduced by 50% compared to the old parameters setting, resulting in a faster and good patient's satisfying technique. No serious adverse effects were recorded.

conclusionthe preclinical and clinical data confirm the efficacy and safety of this high-powered 675 nm laser for several skin condition.

Indexed as

FibroblastsRejuvenationAcne VulgarisAdultCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCicatrixFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSkinSkin AgingSkin Diseasesacne scarsclinical skin rejuvenation managementconfocal microscopyhigh‐powered 675‐nm laserin vitro experimentspigmented lesions

Identifiers

PMID39206771
PMCPMC11359081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.