Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206716›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025

Changes in neighborhood disadvantage over the course of 22 years among community-living older persons.

Thomas M Gill, Robert D Becher, Linda Leo-Summers, Evelyne A Gahbauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas M GillDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6450-0368
Robert D BecherDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Linda Leo-SummersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Evelyne A GahbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
VULNERABILITY, INTERVENING EVENTS &DISABILITY IN AGINGR01AG017560 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2000 to 2025
$7.0M
A Multifactorial Approach to Evaluating Disparities in Outcomes after Major Surgery in Disadvantaged Older PersonsR01MD017298 · NIMHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BECHER, ROBERT DAVID, GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30AG021342NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017560NIA NIH HHS R01AG017560NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD017298NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD017298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong older persons, neighborhood disadvantage is a granular and increasingly used social determinant of health and functional well-being. The frequency of transitions into or out of a disadvantaged neighborhood over time is not known. These transitions may occur when a person moves from one location to another or when the Neighborhood Atlas, the data source for the area deprivation index (ADI) that is used to identify disadvantaged neighborhoods at the census-block level, is updated.

methodsFrom a prospective longitudinal study of community-living persons, aged 70 years or older in South Central Connecticut, neighborhood disadvantage was ascertained every 18 months for 22 years (from March 1998 to March 2020). ADI scores higher than the 80th state percentile were used to distinguish neighborhoods that were disadvantaged (81-100) from those that were not (1-80).

resultsAt baseline, 205 (29.3%) of the 699 participants were living in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Changes in neighborhood disadvantage during 14 consecutive 18-month intervals were relatively uncommon, ranging from 1.5% to 11.8%. Nearly 80% of participants had no change in neighborhood disadvantage and less than 4% had more than one change over a median follow-up of more than 9 years. Overall, the rate of transitions into or out of neighborhood disadvantage was only 2.7 per 100 person-years. These transitions were most common when the Neighborhood Atlas was updated (2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020). Comparable results were observed when decile changes in ADI scores during the 18-month intervals were evaluated.

conclusionsIn longitudinal studies of older persons with extended follow-up, it may not be necessary to update information on disadvantaged neighborhoods in circumstances when it is possible, and the degree of misclassification of neighborhood disadvantage should be relatively low in circumstances when updated information cannot be obtained.

Indexed as

Independent LivingNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsSocial Determinants of HealthVulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overConnecticutFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective Studiesepidemiology of aginglongitudinal studyneighborhood disadvantagesocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39206716
PMCPMC11735297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.