Trial reportCirculation2024
Restrictive Versus Liberal Transfusion in Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial.
Trial report in Circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02981407 (Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Restrictive versus Liberal Transfusion in Myocardial Infarction - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.NEJM evidence · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Revascularization: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2025Trial
- Validity of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes in diagnosing myocardial infarction subtypes.American heart journal · 2026Article
- The Effect of Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Subsequent Myocardial Infarction Type.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Etiological myocardial injury classification versus binary myocardial infarction classification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Patient blood management in general intensive care patients.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Defining myocardial infarction: grades of severity or different aetiology.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2025Article
- Beyond hemoglobin thresholds: A physiology-guided framework for red blood cell transfusion in non-bleeding critically ill patients.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe MINT trial (Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion) raised concern for harm from a restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia. Type 1 and type 2 MI are distinct pathophysiologic entities that may respond differently to blood transfusion. This analysis sought to determine whether the effects of transfusion varied among patients with a type 1 or a type 2 MI and anemia. The authors hypothesized that the liberal transfusion strategy would be of greater benefit in type 2 than in type 1 MI.
methodsThe authors compared rates of death or MI at 30 days in patients with type 1 (n=1460) and type 2 (n=1955) MI and anemia who were randomly allocated to a restrictive (threshold, 7-8 g/dL) or a liberal (threshold, 10 g/dL) transfusion strategy.
resultsThe primary outcome of death or MI was observed in 16% of type 1 MI and 15.4% of type 2 MI patients. The rate of death or MI was higher in patients with type 1 MI randomized to a restrictive (18.2%) versus liberal (13.8%) transfusion strategy (relative risk [RR], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.04-1.67]) with no difference observed between the restrictive (15.8%) and liberal (15.1%) transfusion strategies in patients with type 2 MI (RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.85-1.29]). The test for a differential effect of transfusion strategy by MI type was not statistically significant (
conclusionsThe concern for harm with a restrictive transfusion strategy in patients with acute MI and anemia raised in the MINT primary outcome manuscript may be more apparent in patients with type 1 than type 2 MI. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02981407.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.