Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206436›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Lessons for cannabinoid regulation from electronic nicotine delivery system product regulation.

Brian Yagi, Stan Veuger, Brian J Miller, Paul Larkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian YagiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Stan VeugerDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-2232
Brian J MillerDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-8845
Paul LarkinThe Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC 20002, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis legalization continues to spread, with 38 states permitting the use of medical marijuana, 22 states permitting recreational use, and growing political momentum for federal legalization. The last time the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was tasked with regulating a new product occurred with 2009's Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which created the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP). Thus, the time is ripe to review the history of CTP with particular attention to difficulties the nascent center faced in regulating novel products such as e-cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Specifically, FDA has struggled with defining its scope of authority, determining which review pathway(s) to utilize, and promulgating timely and transparent product standards for marketing authorization-all of which offer lessons for improving cannabis product oversight and enforcement.

Indexed as

cannabis regulationCenter for Tobacco ProductsENDS product regulationFDA policytobacco regulation

Identifiers

PMID39206436
PMCPMC11350284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.