Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206432›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024

MTSC-Net: A Semi-Supervised Counting Network for Estimating the Number of Slash pine New Shoots.

Zhaoxu Zhang, Yanjie Li, Yue Cao, Yu Wang, Xuchao Guo, Xia Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhaoxu ZhangCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shandong Province, China.
Yanjie LiResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-757X
Yue CaoSchool of Big Data, Taishan College of Science and Technology, Taian, 271034, Shandong Province, China.
Yu WangCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shandong Province, China.
Xuchao GuoCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shandong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6457-0534
Xia HaoCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shandong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6817-1779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new shoot density of slash pine serves as a vital indicator for assessing its growth and photosynthetic capacity, while the number of new shoots offers an intuitive reflection of this density. With deep learning methods becoming increasingly popular, automated counting of new shoots has greatly improved in recent years but is still limited by tedious and expensive data collection and labeling. To resolve these issues, this paper proposes a semi-supervised counting network (MTSC-Net) for estimating the number of slash pine new shoots. First, based on the mean-teacher framework, we introduce the improved VGG19 to extract multiscale new shoot features. Second, to connect local new shoot feature information with global channel features, attention feature fusion module is introduced to achieve effective feature fusion. Finally, the new shoot density map and density probability distribution are processed in a fine-grained manner through multiscale dilated convolution of the regression head and classification head. In addition, a masked image modeling strategy is introduced to encourage the contextual understanding of global new shoot features and improve the counting performance. The experimental results show that MTSC-Net outperforms other semi-supervised counting models with labeled percentages ranging from 5% to 50%. When the labeled percentage is 5%, the mean absolute error and root mean square error are 17.71 and 25.49, respectively. These findings demonstrate that our work can be used as an efficient semi-supervised counting method to provide automated support for tree breeding and genetic utilization.

Identifiers

PMID39206432
PMCPMC11350603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.