ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
MTSC-Net: A Semi-Supervised Counting Network for Estimating the Number of Slash pine New Shoots.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth-stage deep learning for UAV hyperspectral estimation of leaf nitrogen content in winter wheat.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Low-annotation apple flower counting: A color-SAM enhanced and uncertainty-guided semi-supervised framework.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Innovative 3D photosynthetic trait assessment of slash pine using drone-LiDAR fusion and machine learning algorithms.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Genetic constraints on in-situ reflectance spectral variation in bermudagrass populations across Hainan Island.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Volumetric Deep Learning-Based Precision Phenotyping of Gene-Edited Tomato for Vertical Farming.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new shoot density of slash pine serves as a vital indicator for assessing its growth and photosynthetic capacity, while the number of new shoots offers an intuitive reflection of this density. With deep learning methods becoming increasingly popular, automated counting of new shoots has greatly improved in recent years but is still limited by tedious and expensive data collection and labeling. To resolve these issues, this paper proposes a semi-supervised counting network (MTSC-Net) for estimating the number of slash pine new shoots. First, based on the mean-teacher framework, we introduce the improved VGG19 to extract multiscale new shoot features. Second, to connect local new shoot feature information with global channel features, attention feature fusion module is introduced to achieve effective feature fusion. Finally, the new shoot density map and density probability distribution are processed in a fine-grained manner through multiscale dilated convolution of the regression head and classification head. In addition, a masked image modeling strategy is introduced to encourage the contextual understanding of global new shoot features and improve the counting performance. The experimental results show that MTSC-Net outperforms other semi-supervised counting models with labeled percentages ranging from 5% to 50%. When the labeled percentage is 5%, the mean absolute error and root mean square error are 17.71 and 25.49, respectively. These findings demonstrate that our work can be used as an efficient semi-supervised counting method to provide automated support for tree breeding and genetic utilization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.