ArticleOTO open
Skull Base Osteomyelitis: A 5-Year Review and Prognostic Outcome in a Single Tertiary Institution.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing pathogen detection in skull base osteomyelitis: a comparative analysis of swab versus biopsy sampling.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Odontogenic, atypical skull-base osteomyelitis: diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic insights-a case report and mini-review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study is to review the clinical parameters associated with skull base osteomyelitis (SBO), with a secondary aim of studying their association with patient outcomes 1 and 6 months after treatment initiation. Study Design: This is a single-center restrospective observational study. Setting: The study was conducted from January 2018 to December 2022 at the University Malaya Medical Center in Kuala Lumpur. Methods: Patients aged over 15 years with a diagnosis of SBO were included in the study. Clinical parameters, investigations, and follow-up records were recorded. The disease outcomes were analyzed at 1 and 6 months after treatment initiation using multivariable analyses. Results: The study identified 31 patients with SBO, the majority of whom were elderly males with comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Otalgia and otorrhea were the most common symptoms, and computed tomography scans were used for diagnosis. Conclusion: Early recognition, prompt treatment, better control of comorbidities, nutrition, and monitoring can improve SBO outcomes and reduce complications. Therefore, as the prevalence of SBO increases, diagnostic criteria or management guidelines should be established to guide the best clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.