ArticleIntelligent systems with applications2024
A graph-based cardiac arrhythmia classification methodology using one-lead ECG recordings.
Article in Intelligent systems with applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ECG-GraphNet: Advanced arrhythmia classification based on graph convolutional networks.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Reconstructing 12-lead ECG from reduced lead sets using an encoder-decoder convolutional neural network.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we present a novel graph-based methodology for an accurate classification of cardiac arrhythmia diseases using a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The proposed approach employs the visibility graph technique to generate graphs from time signals. Subsequently, informative features are extracted from each graph and then fed into classifiers to match the input ECG signal with the appropriate target arrhythmia class. The six target classes in this study are normal (N), left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), premature ventricular contraction (PVC), atrial premature contraction (A), and fusion (F) beats. Three classification models were explored, including graph convolutional neural network (GCN), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and random forest (RF). ECG recordings from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database were utilized to train and evaluate these classifiers. The results indicate that the multi-layer perceptron model attains the highest performance, showcasing an average accuracy of 99.02%. Following closely, the random forest achieves a strong performance as well, with an accuracy of 98.94% while providing critical intuitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.