ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2023
Geometry-invariant abnormality detection.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is a highly heterogeneous condition best visualised in positron emission tomography. Due to this heterogeneity, a general-purpose cancer detection model can be built using unsupervised learning anomaly detection models. While prior work in this field has showcased the efficacy of abnormality detection methods (e.g. Transformer-based), these have shown significant vulnerabilities to differences in data geometry. Changes in image resolution or observed field of view can result in inaccurate predictions, even with significant data pre-processing and augmentation. We propose a new spatial conditioning mechanism that enables models to adapt and learn from varying data geometries, and apply it to a state-of-the-art Vector-Quantized Variational Autoencoder + Transformer abnormality detection model. We showcase that this spatial conditioning mechanism statistically-significantly improves model performance on whole-body data compared to the same model without conditioning, while allowing the model to perform inference at varying data geometries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.