Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206322›Full record

ReviewCatalysis science & technology2024

Recent advances in bifunctional synthesis gas conversion to chemicals and fuels with a comparison to monofunctional processes.

J L Weber, C Hernández Mejía, K P de Jong, P E de Jongh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Catalysis science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular fence Cu-based catalyst for CONature communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J L WeberMaterials Chemistry and Catalysis, Universiteit Utrecht Universiteitsweg 99 Utrecht Netherlands p.e.dejongh@uu.nl.
C Hernández MejíaMaterials Chemistry and Catalysis, Universiteit Utrecht Universiteitsweg 99 Utrecht Netherlands p.e.dejongh@uu.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-2956
K P de JongMaterials Chemistry and Catalysis, Universiteit Utrecht Universiteitsweg 99 Utrecht Netherlands p.e.dejongh@uu.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-8110
P E de JonghMaterials Chemistry and Catalysis, Universiteit Utrecht Universiteitsweg 99 Utrecht Netherlands p.e.dejongh@uu.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2216-2620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to meet the climate goals of the Paris Agreement and limit the potentially catastrophic consequences of climate change, we must move away from the use of fossil feedstocks for the production of chemicals and fuels. The conversion of synthesis gas (a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide) can contribute to this. Several reactions allow to convert synthesis gas to oxygenates (such as methanol), olefins or waxes. In a consecutive step, these products can be further converted into chemicals, such as dimethyl ether, short olefins, or aromatics. Alternatively, fuels like gasoline, diesel, or kerosene can be produced. These two different steps can be combined using bifunctional catalysis for direct conversion of synthesis gas to chemicals and fuels. The synergistic effects of combining two different catalysts are discussed in terms of activity and selectivity and compared to processes based on consecutive reaction with single conversion steps. We found that bifunctional catalysis can be a strong tool for the highly selective production of dimethyl ether and gasoline with high octane numbers. In terms of selectivity bifunctional catalysis for short olefins or aromatics struggles to compete with processes consisting of single catalytic conversion steps.

Identifiers

PMID39206322
PMCPMC11347923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.