ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Enhancing dementia risk screening with GAN-synthesized periodontal examination and general blood test data.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of data augmentation to improve dementia risk prediction using machine learning models. Recent studies have shown that basic blood tests are cost-effective in predicting cognitive function. However, developing models that address various conditions poses challenges due to constraints associated with blood test results and cognitive assessments, including high costs, limited sample sizes, and missing data from tests not performed in certain facilities. Despite being often limited by small sample sizes, periodontal examination data have also emerged as a cost-effective screening tool. Methods: To address these challenges, this study explored the effectiveness of data augmentation using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique for Regression with Gaussian noise (SMOGN), a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), and a Conditional Tabular GAN (CTGAN) on periodontal examination and blood test data. The datasets included parameters such as cognitive assessment results from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), demographic characteristics, periodontal examination data, and blood test results. Linear regression models, random forests, and deep neural networks were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the synthesized data. Results: This study used measured data from 108 participants and the synthesized data generated from the measured data. External validity was evaluated using a different dataset of 41 participants with missing items. The results suggested that normal GANs have the advantage of investigating models in data diversity, whereas CTGANs preserve the data structure and linear relationships in tabular data from the measured data, which drastically improves linear regression models. Discussion: Importantly, by interpolating sparse areas in the distribution, such as age, the synthesized models maintained prediction accuracy for test data with extreme inputs. These findings suggest that GAN-synthesized data can effectively address regression problems and improve dementia risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.