ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2024
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Diagnosis and Early Treatment of First-Episode Psychosis.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Errors or Adaptations? A Critical Review of Predictive Processing in Psychiatry.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Expanding Coordinated Specialty Care to Early-Stage Bipolar Disorder: Development and Implementation of the STRIDE Model.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A pipeline for enabling path-specific causal fairness in observational health data.Proceedings of the ... Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite recognition that early intervention for first-episode psychosis (FEP) improves outcomes, Black youth with FEP continue to experience critical disparities in care. A historical lack of scientific focus on racial and ethnic factors in the study of psychosis and scant investigations among publicly insured (ie, Medicaid-enrolled) youth hinder our ability to understand and address factors that contribute to disparities in early FEP care. Strategies for improving FEP services for Black youth are reliant on more precise identification of Study Design: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of Ohio Medicaid claims data was performed for 987 982 youth aged 15-24 years between 2010 and 2020 to examine: (1) the likelihood of FEP diagnosis, (2) the type of psychotic disorder diagnosis received, and (3) receipt of treatment following psychosis onset. Study Results: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) youth, relative to non-Hispanic White (NHW) peers, were more likely to be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder and were further more likely to receive a diagnosis of schizophrenia relative to an affective psychotic disorder. In the first year following FEP diagnosis, NHB youth were also less likely to receive psychotherapy than NHW youth; this disparity was no longer present when examined at 2 years following FEP. Conclusions: In this study, Black youth experienced disparities in both the diagnosis and early treatment of FEP. Additional efforts are needed to understand and address these observed disparities and to promote equitable access to FEP care during the critical early illness phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.