ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malaria Prevention: Progress to Date.Drugs · 2026Review
- Digital PCR Reveals High PvDBP1 but not PvEBP/DBP2 and PvRBP2b Copy Number in Plasmodium vivax From Duffy-Negative Individuals in Central Africa.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- In Vitro Metabolism of Doping Agents (Stanozolol, LGD-4033, Anastrozole, GW1516, Trimetazidine) by Human Seminal Vesicle and Liver Fractions.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenetic variations and clinical implications of actionable CYP2D6/CYP2C19 variants in Central Indian patients with common mental disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- StarTRAC-Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Genomic DNA (gDNA) samples from Coriell (n = 13) and from blood, saliva, and liver tissue (n = 17) representing 0-6 copies were tested on the Absolute Q and QX200 platforms. Custom TaqMan™ copy number (CN) assays targeting Results: Overall, results between the two platforms and digestions methods were consistent. The "One-pot" digestion method and optically multiplexing up to three Conclusion: The Absolute Q produced accurate and reliable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.