Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206218›Full record

ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2024

Exploring geometry of genome space via Grassmann manifolds.

Xiaoguang Li, Tao Zhou, Xingdong Feng, Shing-Tung Yau, Stephen S-T Yau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoguang LiSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China.
Tao ZhouDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Xingdong FengSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shing-Tung YauDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Stephen S-T YauDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to understand the geometry of genome space in biology. After transforming genome sequences into frequency matrices of the chaos game representation (FCGR), we regard a genome sequence as a point in a suitable Grassmann manifold by analyzing the column space of the corresponding FCGR. To assess the sequence similarity, we employ the generalized Grassmannian distance, an intrinsic geometric distance that differs from the traditional Euclidean distance used in the classical k-mer frequency-based methods. With this method, we constructed phylogenetic trees for various genome datasets, including influenza A virus hemagglutinin gene, Orthocoronavirinae genome, and SARS-CoV-2 complete genome sequences. Our comparative analysis with multiple sequence alignment and alignment-free methods for large-scale sequences revealed that our method, which employs the subspace distance between the column spaces of different FCGRs (FCGR-SD), outperformed its competitors in terms of both speed and accuracy. In addition, we used low-dimensional visualization of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences and spike protein nucleotide sequences with our methods, resulting in some intriguing findings. We not only propose a novel and efficient algorithm for comparing genome sequences but also demonstrate that genome data have some intrinsic manifold structures, providing a new geometric perspective for molecular biology studies.

Identifiers

PMID39206218
PMCPMC11350263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.