Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39206175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Microbiological culture versus 16S/18S rRNA gene PCR-sanger sequencing for infectious keratitis: a three-arm, diagnostic cross-sectional study.

Yasmeen Hammoudeh, Lakshmi Suresh, Zun Zheng Ong, Michelle M Lister, Imran Mohammed, D John I Thomas, Jennifer L Cottell, Jennifer M Holden, Dalia G Said, Harminder S Dua and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Simple and Rapid Synthesis of Spherical Silver Phosphate (AgInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging diagnostic modalities in microbial keratitis: Beyond culture and smear.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yasmeen HammoudehDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Lakshmi SureshDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Zun Zheng OngNew Cross Hospital Eye Infirmary, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Michelle M ListerDepartment of Microbiology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Imran MohammedSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
D John I ThomasMicropathology Ltd., Venture Centre, University of Warwick Science Park, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Jennifer L CottellMicropathology Ltd., Venture Centre, University of Warwick Science Park, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Jennifer M HoldenMicropathology Ltd., Venture Centre, University of Warwick Science Park, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Dalia G SaidDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Harminder S DuaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Darren Shu Jeng TingAcademic Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To compare the diagnostic performance of microbiological culture and 16S/18S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-Sanger sequencing for infectious keratitis (IK) and to analyse the effect of clinical disease severity on test performance and inter-test concordance. Methods: This was a three-arm, diagnostic cross-sectional study. We included all eligible patients who presented with presumed bacterial/fungal keratitis to the Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK, between June 2021 and September 2022. All patients underwent simultaneous culture (either direct or indirect culture, or both) and 16S (pan-bacterial)/18S (pan-fungal) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) PCR-Sanger sequencing. The bacterial/fungal genus and species identified on culture were confirmed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Relevant clinical data were also collected to analyze for any potential clinico-microbiological correlation. Main outcome measures included the diagnostic yield, test accuracy (including sensitivity and specificity), and inter-test agreement [including percent agreement and Cohen's kappa ( Results: A total of 81 patients (86 episodes of IK) were included in this study. All organisms identified were of bacterial origin. Diagnostic yields were similar among direct culture (52.3%), indirect culture (50.8%), and PCR (43.1%; Conclusions: This study highlights a similar diagnostic performance of direct culture, indirect culture and 16S rRNA PCR for bacterial keratitis, with substantial inter-test concordance. PCR serves as a useful diagnostic adjuvant to culture, particularly in culture-negative cases or those with lesser disease severity (where culture-PCR concordance is lower).

Indexed as

16s RNAcorneal infectioncorneal ulcerdiagnostic testgene sequencingkeratitismicrobial keratitispolymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Identifiers

PMID39206175
PMCPMC11352289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.