ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2024
Bipolar disorder: Construction and analysis of a joint diagnostic model using random forest and feedforward neural networks.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model-informed precision dosing of quetiapine in bipolar affective disorder patients: initial dose recommendation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To construct a diagnostic model for Bipolar Disorder (BD) depressive phase using peripheral tissue RNA data from patients and combining Random Forest with Feedforward Neural Network methods. Methods: Datasets GSE23848, GSE39653, and GSE69486 were selected, and differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the limma package in R. Key genes from the differentially expressed genes were identified using the Random Forest method. These key genes' expression levels in each sample were used to train a Feedforward Neural Network model. Techniques like L1 regularization, early stopping, and dropout layers were employed to prevent model overfitting. Model performance was then validated, followed by GO, KEGG, and protein-protein interaction network analyses. Results: The final model was a Feedforward Neural Network with two hidden layers and two dropout layers, comprising 2345 trainable parameters. Model performance on the validation set, assessed through 1000 bootstrap resampling iterations, demonstrated a specificity of 0.769 (95 % CI 0.571-1.000), sensitivity of 0.818 (95 % CI 0.533-1.000), AUC value of 0.832 (95 % CI 0.642-0.979), and accuracy of 0.792 (95 % CI 0.625-0.958). Enrichment analysis of key genes indicated no significant enrichment in any known pathways. Conclusion: Key genes with biological significance were identified based on the decrease in Gini coefficient within the Random Forest model. The combined use of Random Forest and Feedforward Neural Network to establish a diagnostic model showed good classification performance in Bipolar Disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.