ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2024
Persistence with medical glaucoma therapy in newly diagnosed patients.
Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gasotransmitters in Glaucoma: A New Paradigm.Bulletin of pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- First-line glaucoma monotherapy medication patterns in Finland during 1995-2019 based on a population-based study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monotherapy, age, and side effects are significant risk factors for the discontinuation of antiglaucoma therapy. Long-term therapy persistence is crucial for slowing disease progression and preventing irreversible blindness. Therefore, it is essential to identify patients at higher risk of discontinuation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the real-world persistence of antiglaucoma therapy in patients diagnosed with glaucoma in the primary healthcare units of the Lisbon and Tagus Valley regions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study by collecting data from the prescription records of new antiglaucoma drug users diagnosed with glaucoma between 2012 and 2013 in the Primary Health Care Units of the Lisbon and Tagus Valley Region. These patients were followed over 3 years. Therapy persistence was measured as the proportion of patients remaining on any antiglaucoma drug, regardless of any modifications or switching of drugs over time. Persistence was assessed at three time points: the end of the first, second, and third years of the observation period. Results: A total of 2138 patients treated using new antiglaucoma drugs (867 [40.6%] male patients; 1271 [59.4%] female patients) were included in the study. Over the observation period, the overall persistence rate decreased from 91.9% (n = 1965) in the first year to 67.3% (n = 1439) in the third year. Older patients (≥ 65 years) showed higher persistence rates, although there was a decrease over the 3-year follow-up period (from 1481 [92.7%] to 1124 [70.4%]). Additionally, participants initially treated with monotherapy showed higher persistence rates, ranging from 92.4% (n = 1186) in the first year to 70.2% (n = 901) in the third year. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of patient follow-up over time, as almost one in three new antiglaucoma therapy users completely discontinued treatment, potentially risking disease progression. This could be mitigated with proper use of these drugs. Further studies should utilize recent health information systems to explore the impact of medication adherence and persistence on the functional and structural outcomes in patients with glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.