ArticleClinical case reports2024
Aberrant origin of the left coronary artery from the right coronary sinus with a common orifice with the right coronary artery.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aberrant origin of the left coronary artery from the right coronary sinus with a common orifice with the right coronary artery.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery, accurate classification is essential for effective management. Despite surgical refusal, successful stenting and medication can lead to favorable outcomes. Regular monitoring ensures ongoing cardiac health. Abstract: Coronary artery anomalies, including anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva, are rare occurrences with varying clinical significance. Accurate classification of these anomalies is crucial for determining their implications and guiding management. A 50-year-old man presented with chest pain and was diagnosed with an anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery. Despite refusing surgery, successful stenting and medication led to a favorable outcome. Regular monitoring is scheduled. Accurate classification of coronary anomalies, such as the left main coronary artery anomaly described, is vital for effective management. Even when surgical intervention is declined, alternative treatments, such as stenting, can be successful. Regular monitoring ensures ongoing cardiac health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.