ReviewCardiology research2024
National Estimates for the Percentage of All Readmissions With Demographic Features, Morbidity, Overall and Gender-Specific Mortality of Transcutaneous Versus Open Surgical Tricuspid Valve Replacement/Repair.
Review in Cardiology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous interventions in tricuspid valve disease: a new era in cardiac treatment.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Unveiling Sex Differences in Tricuspid Valve Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical Management.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to determine national estimates for the percentage of all readmissions with demographic features, length of stay (LOS), cost analysis, comorbidities, complications, overall and gender-specific mortality and complications of transcutaneous tricuspid valve replacement/repair (TTVR) vs. open surgical tricuspid valve replacement/repair (open TVR). Methods: Data were extrapolated from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) 2015-19. Of the 75,266,750 (unweighted) cases recorded in the 2015 - 2019 dataset, 429 had one or more of the percutaneous approach codes as per the ICD-10 dataset, and 10,077 had one or more of the open approach codes. Results: Overall, the number of cases performed each year through open TVR was higher than TTVR, but there was an increased trend towards the TTVR every passing year. TTVR was performed more in females and advanced age groups than open TVR. The LOS and cost were lower in the TTVR group than in open TVR. Patients undergoing TTVR had more underlying comorbidities like congestive heart failure, hypertension, and uncomplicated diabetes mellitus. Overall mortality was 3.49% in TTVR vs. 6.09% in open TVR. The gender-specific analysis demonstrated higher female mortality in the open TVR compared to TTVR (5.45% vs. 3.03%). Male mortality was statistically insignificant between the two groups (6.8% vs. 4.3%, P-value = 0.15). Patients with TTVR had lower rates of complications than open TVR, except for arrhythmias, which were higher in TTVR. Patients undergoing open TVR required more intracardiac support, such as intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella, than TTVR. Conclusion: TTVR is an emerging alternative to open TVR in patients with tricuspid valve diseases, especially tricuspid regurgitation. Despite having more underlying comorbidities, the TTVR group had lower in-hospital mortality, hospital cost, LOS, and fewer complications than open TVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.