ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2024
Probing hippocampal stimulation in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy with functional MRI.
Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invasive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Epilepsy.Seminars in neurology · 2025Review
- Neuromodulation in Small Animal fMRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical neurostimulation is currently used to manage epilepsy, but the most effective approach for minimizing seizure occurrence is uncertain. While functional MRI (fMRI) can reveal which brain areas are affected by stimulation, simultaneous deep brain stimulation (DBS)-fMRI examinations in patients are rare and the possibility to investigate multiple stimulation protocols is limited. In this study, we utilized the intrahippocampal kainate mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) to systematically examine the brain-wide responses to electrical stimulation using fMRI. We compared fMRI responses of saline-injected controls and epileptic mice during stimulation in the septal hippocampus (HC) at 10 Hz and demonstrated the effects of different stimulation amplitudes (80-230 μA) and frequencies (1-100 Hz) in epileptic mice. Motivated by recent studies exploring 1 Hz stimulation to prevent epileptic seizures, we furthermore investigated the effect of prolonged 1 Hz stimulation with fMRI. Compared to sham controls, epileptic mice showed less propagation to the contralateral HC, but significantly stronger responses in the ipsilateral HC and a wider spread to the entorhinal cortex and septal region. Varying the stimulation amplitude had little effect on the resulting activation patterns, whereas the stimulation frequency represented the key parameter and determined whether the induced activation remained local or spread from the hippocampal formation into cortical areas. Prolonged stimulation of epileptic mice at 1 Hz caused a slight reduction in local excitability. In this way, our study contributes to a better understanding of these stimulation paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.