ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Genomic insights into prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: value of CNV-seq and WES in clinical practice.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated genomic and clinical indicators for predicting foetal chromosomal abnormalities: development and validation of a nomogram model.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Clinical study of single nucleotide polymorphism-based chromosome microarray analysis in the etiological diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genetic impact of copy number variations on congenital heart defects: Current insights and future directions.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- Integration of chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with cardiac ultrasound anomalies.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Diseases in Public Health: Chromosomal Abnormalities in Congenital Heart Disease Causing Sudden Cardiac Death in Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the efficiency of CNV-seq and WES in detecting genetic cause of congenital heart disease (CHDs) in prenatal diagnoses and to compare CNV detection rate between isolated and non-isolated CHD cases. We conducted a retrospective study of 118 Chinese fetuses diagnosed with CHD by prenatal ultrasound. Participants underwent CNV-seq and, if necessary, WES to detect chromosomal and single nucleotide variations. The overall detection rate for pathogenic or likely pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities was 16.9%, including 7.6% aneuploidies and 9.3% pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs), predominantly 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (54.4%). The sensitivity and specificity of CNV-Seq for detecting P/L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.