ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Nanopore Sequencing Technology: A Reliable Method for Pathogen Diagnosis in Elderly Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nanopore sequencing for microbiological diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Current status and prospects of nanopore sequencing technology in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Severe empyema caused by mixed oral anaerobic bacterial infection: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Meta-Analysis of Long-Read and Short-Read Sequencing for Metagenomic Profiling of the Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Global trends in the application of nanopore sequencing technology in the detection of infectious disease pathogens: a bibliometric analysis from 2014 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Next-generation sequencing of the metagenome (mNGS) is gaining traction as a valuable tool for diagnosing infectious diseases. Compared to mNGS, pathogen detection based on Oxford Nanopore Technology further shortens the detection time. This study seeks to assess the efficacy of Nanopore sequencing in identifying pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among elderly individuals in China. Patients and Methods: From January 2023 to June 2023, elderly patients with CAP were prospectively recruited from Hangzhou First People's Hospital. A comprehensive set of clinical data was gathered, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples were collected. Concurrently, pathogen identification was performed using conventional microbiological diagnostic methods, Illumina sequencing, and Nanopore sequencing, and the diagnostic efficacy of pathogen detection was compared. Results: The study included a total of 29 patients. The diagnostic positivity rates of traditional microbiological detection, Illumina sequencing, and Nanopore sequencing were 24.1%, 51.7%, and 48.3%, respectively. Their diagnostic specificities were 91.7%, 50%, and 75%, respectively. Compared to traditional microbiological detection, both Nanopore and Illumina sequencing showed significantly increased sensitivity. However, Nanopore sequencing exhibited relatively better consistency with the final clinical comprehensive diagnosis, with a Kappa value of 0.574. This outperformed traditional microbiological detection and Illumina sequencing, which had a Kappa value of 0.296 and 0.402, respectively. In addition, Nanopore sequencing required the shortest turnaround time. Conclusion: Nanopore sequencing technology demonstrates as a reliable and rapid method for detecting pathogens in elderly patients with CAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.