ArticleCureus2024
Complications and Revision Surgery in Orthopedics Focusing on Traumatology.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthopedic traumatology, a vital component of orthopedic surgery, poses significant challenges in managing complications and necessitating revision surgeries. These challenges impact clinical outcomes, healthcare economics, and patient well-being.
objectiveThis study aimed to provide insights that informed clinical decision-making and improved patient outcomes by thoroughly examining the range of complications encountered in orthopedic traumatology. Specifically, the research focused on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of revision surgeries. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cohort research looked at orthopedic traumatology complications and revision procedures over a thorough two-year period from March 2021 to March 2023 at Hayatabad Medical Complex in Peshawar, Pakistan. The following information was gathered from 316 patients receiving orthopedic surgery for traumatic injuries: demographics, kinds of trauma, surgical methods, complications, indications, methods, and results of revision surgery. For data analysis, chi-square tests and descriptive statistics were used, with the goal of finding patterns and correlations within the research population.
resultsThe average age of the 316 patients was 42.5 years, and 64.76% of them were male (n = 192). The most frequent kind of trauma (n = 218; 69.01%) was fractures, which were mostly brought on by falls (n = 147; 46.52%). The most common surgical method (n = 138; 43.67%) was found to be internal fixation, which was followed by external fixation (n = 67; 21.20%). The most common complication (n = 78; 24.68%) was surgical site infection, which resulted in revision procedures mostly for infection (n = 68; 21.52%) and implant failure (n = 56; 17.72%). Debridement was the most often used revision approach (n = 95; 30.10%), and it was substantially correlated with surgical outcomes, such as increased function (31%) and full resolution (36%).
conclusionThis research emphasizes the need to maximize patient outcomes for improved well-being and highlights the crucial role that careful care plays in managing complications and revision operations in orthopedic traumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.