ArticleCureus2024
Assessing the Role of Transvaginal Sonography in Post-menopausal Bleeding: A Less Invasive Approach to Identify Endometrial Carcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Post-menopausal bleeding (PMB) is a very common complaint seen in current practice. Endometrial carcinoma (EC) commonly presents with PMB. Endometrial biopsy is the tool for definitive diagnosis, but it is invasive. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is a non-invasive tool that can help us in the initial evaluation of such patients. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on 76 women with PMB. TVS and histopathological study, along with basic evaluation and investigations, were performed on all participants, followed by necessary treatment and follow-up. Data collected were studied and statistically analyzed. Results A maximum of 27.63% (n=21) of patients had endometrial atrophy causing their PMB. Proliferative endometrium was observed in 21.06% (n=16) of cases, 13.15% (n=10) of women had secretory endometrium, 23.68% (n=18) had simple endometrial hyperplasia, 3.94% (n=3) had complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, and another 3.94% (n=3) had complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia. Further classifying, women with benign hyperplasia included 27.63% (n=21) and those with atypical hyperplasia included 3.94% (n=3). Out of the 5.26% (n=4) patients diagnosed with EC on histopathology, TVS identified carcinoma in 75% (n=3) cases. This indicates that the sensitivity and specificity of TVS in detecting EC are 75% and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) is 100%, the negative predictive value (NPV) is 98.63%, and the accuracy is 98.68%. Conclusion If the cut-off for endometrial thickness is set at 4 mm, then TVS proves to be an effective and reliable tool for screening and diagnosing EC. It can thus serve as a safe threshold to screen patients with PMB using TVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.