Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39205753›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparative Assessment of Postoperative Pain After Three Irrigation Techniques in Single-Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis and Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pravin Kumar, Sumit Kumar Yadav, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Rajat Sharma, Karishma Pathak, Arunkumar Duraisamy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07196215 (Comparison of Post-operative Pain After Different Root Canal Irrigant Activation Methods in Maxillary Incisors With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07196215 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Post-operative Pain After Different Root Canal Irrigant Activation Methods in Maxillary Incisors With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANA AHMADRan2026 to 2027Enrolled72ConditionsIrriversible Pulpitis, Irrigation, Activation, PatientArmspassive ultrasonic activation, sonic activation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pravin KumarConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Sumit Kumar YadavConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Vinay Kumar ChughOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Rajat SharmaConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, IND.
Karishma PathakConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Arunkumar DuraisamyConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to assess the impact of positive pressure, negative pressure (EndoVac), and sonic-activated irrigation (EndoActivator) on postoperative pain with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis. The hypothesis tested the superiority of negative pressure irrigation in reducing pain and analgesic requirements. Methodology Forty-eight eligible patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled, ensuring comprehension through verbal and written patient information sheets. The sample size calculation, based on prior data, determined 14 teeth per group with consideration for potential dropouts, resulting in 16 teeth per group. Inclusion criteria included healthy individuals aged 16-65 years with single-rooted teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis, while exclusion criteria comprised recent analgesic intake, pregnancy, lactation, and specific dental conditions. Participants were allocated to three groups using computer-generated block randomization with allocation concealment via sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. While blinding of the operator was not feasible, patient and assessor blinding was ensured. Preoperative data collection included patient demographics, tooth details, and pain intensity assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Root canal therapy procedures, conducted in two visits, included instrumentation and irrigation using 3% NaOCl across three groups: positive pressure irrigation, negative pressure irrigation, and sonic activation. Postoperative pain and analgesic intake were evaluated using VAS at specific intervals. One assessor tabulated and analyzed all the information. Results Postoperative pain assessments revealed that the EV group experienced the lowest pain levels, followed by the EA and SVN groups, with significant differences observed at six and 24 hours postoperatively (p < 0.05). Analgesic requirements correlated with pain levels, with the SVN group requiring the most analgesics and the EV group the least, highlighting the efficacy of the interventions. Conclusions Negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac) significantly reduced postoperative pain compared to conventional side-vented needle irrigation. These findings enhance understanding and guide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing endodontic procedures and prioritizing patient comfort and outcomes.

Indexed as

apical periodontitisendoactivatorendovacirrigationnegative apical pressurepostoperative painside vented needle

Identifiers

PMID39205753
PMCPMC11357723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.