ReviewCureus2024
The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- IL 15 enhances preclinical efficacy of anti-core 1 O-glycans monoclonal antibody NEO-201 against human endometrial and ovarian cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Evaluating Radiotheranostic Targets for Endometrial Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Tumor Mutational Burden in Cervical Cancer as Potential Marker for Immunotherapy Responders.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecologic cancers remain a significant health burden worldwide. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment approach across various cancer types. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or in combination with other therapies, in the treatment of gynecologic cancers. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials of immunotherapy in gynecologic cancers. Randomized controlled trials and prospective studies were included. MMAT tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. Risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools for each study design. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in combination with standard therapies, demonstrated improved progression-free survival across multiple trials. Notable results include improved outcomes with pembrolizumab in endometrial and cervical cancers, and promising combinations of PARP inhibitors with checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Safety profiles were generally consistent with known effects of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy shows significant promise in improving outcomes for patients with gynecologic cancers. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and combination strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.