Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39205712›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Subperiosteal Ridge Augmentation Technique Utilizing Sticky Bone: A Case Series.

Kandhal Yazhini P, Nidhita Suresh, G Kaarthikeyan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07210385 (Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07210385 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury): A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsMaxillary Augmentation in Horizontal Bone DefectArmsanterior horizontal maxillary bone augmentation using autogenous and bovine sticky bone, anterior horizontal maxillary bone augmentation using autogenous and bovine bone shell technique (khoury)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sticky Bone: Advances and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kandhal Yazhini PPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Nidhita SureshPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
G KaarthikeyanPeriodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case series presents the application of a novel minimally invasive technique for augmenting ridge defects across four edentulous sites, thereby circumventing common postoperative complications associated with conventional ridge augmentation techniques. The case series details three cases encompassing four edentulous sites with class I and III ridge defects. This approach uses a minimally invasive subperiosteal technique for ridge augmentation, followed by a delayed implant placement. Subperiosteal incisions were made mesial to the edentulous sites, and subperiosteal pouches were created using tunneling instruments. Sticky bone (comprising injectable platelet-rich fibrin (IPRF) and xenograft) was applied to the pouches, followed by Vicryl suturing. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessed dimensional changes between baseline and 180 days post-ridge augmentation. Subsequently, during implant insertion after 180 days, bone samples were collected, decalcified using 10% formic acid, and sectioned to a thickness of 5 µm. Histological analysis of the bone samples was conducted using a bright field microscope, while histomorphometric analysis was carried out using Image J software. The modified subperiosteal tunneling technique employed in this case report, coupled with using sticky bone as an augmentation material, demonstrates promise as a reliable method for ridge augmentation.

Indexed as

iprfquality of liferidge augmentationridge defectssticky bone

Identifiers

PMID39205712
PMCPMC11357732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.