ArticleCureus2024
Subperiosteal Ridge Augmentation Technique Utilizing Sticky Bone: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07210385 (Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury): A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sticky bone in regenerative dentistry: a paradigm shift in graft stability or a promising technique still under scrutiny?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Xenogeneic Bone, Hyaluronic Acid, and Dermal Matrix by Tunnel Technique: A Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Sticky Bone: Advances and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case series presents the application of a novel minimally invasive technique for augmenting ridge defects across four edentulous sites, thereby circumventing common postoperative complications associated with conventional ridge augmentation techniques. The case series details three cases encompassing four edentulous sites with class I and III ridge defects. This approach uses a minimally invasive subperiosteal technique for ridge augmentation, followed by a delayed implant placement. Subperiosteal incisions were made mesial to the edentulous sites, and subperiosteal pouches were created using tunneling instruments. Sticky bone (comprising injectable platelet-rich fibrin (IPRF) and xenograft) was applied to the pouches, followed by Vicryl suturing. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessed dimensional changes between baseline and 180 days post-ridge augmentation. Subsequently, during implant insertion after 180 days, bone samples were collected, decalcified using 10% formic acid, and sectioned to a thickness of 5 µm. Histological analysis of the bone samples was conducted using a bright field microscope, while histomorphometric analysis was carried out using Image J software. The modified subperiosteal tunneling technique employed in this case report, coupled with using sticky bone as an augmentation material, demonstrates promise as a reliable method for ridge augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.