Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39205703›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Echo Report Understood: Improving Education in Echocardiography for Junior Doctors.

Molly M Nichols, Jane Draper, Jessica Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Molly M NicholsCardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Jane DraperCardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Jessica WebbCardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With echocardiography standing as the most widely used cardiac imaging modality, echocardiography report interpretation is a core responsibility of junior doctors. The literature, however, reveals a deficit in echocardiography education. The implications of this for patient care should not be ignored. To address this need, a hybrid teaching session was developed for junior (intern and resident grade) doctors, with the aim to increase understanding of echocardiography and increase confidence in report interpretation. Pre- and post-session data were analysed. Results revealed that the vast majority of respondents received less than an hour of echocardiography teaching at medical school, with over two-thirds receiving less than an hour in the postgraduate setting. A total of 80% of doctors interpreted echocardiography reports weekly, with almost all doctors perceiving this skill as important. Despite this, an overwhelming majority of doctors did not feel confident interpreting reports. The educational intervention achieved significant increases in perceived understanding of echocardiography and confidence with report interpretation. Participants were better able to identify cardiac pathology and understand report terminology. This intervention has the scope to improve patient safety through better management of cardiac patients and recognition of pathology from echocardiography. This work also identifies a need for more echocardiography education, having uncovered a concerning lack of confidence amongst junior doctors and an appetite for further teaching on this important topic.

Indexed as

clinical diagnosticsechocardiography diagnosisechocardiography educationechocardiography findingsechocardiography-heart failure-valvular heart diseasefoundation year 1 doctorinternal medic (cgm)medical educationpostgraduate medical education (pgme)undergraduate and graduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID39205703
PMCPMC11357734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.