ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Preliminary Outcomes of Calcaneal Body Lengthening for the Calcaneus Shortening.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of the Ilizarov apparatus on external fixation: Current modifications of the 75-year-old orthopedic tool.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
- [Research progress on correction of severe foot and ankle deformities with digital hexapod external fixators].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- Enhanced Bone Regeneration by Schwann Cells through Coupling of Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis via β-catenin signaling in a Preclinical Model of Distraction Osteogenesis.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Limb Reconstruction-A New Paradigm in Orthopedic Development.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For lengthening irregular bones, such as calcaneus, there are few reports in the literature. This study aimed to introduce the treatment strategy and preliminary outcomes for calcaneus shortening using calcaneal body lengthening. From January 2017 to January 2022, calcaneal lengthening was conducted for three patients (two males and one female) who suffered from traumatic calcaneal shortening. The Achilles tendon was lengthened in one patient. After osteotomy of the calcaneus, an Ilizarov frame was used to gradually (1 mm/day) distract the calcaneal fragment. The lengthening procedure was stopped when the calcaneal height and length were restored based on radiography. The fixator was removed after bone union. The average follow-up length was 18 months (range, 14-24 months). X-ray was used for radiological assessments. Patients reported satisfaction using the 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Clinical outcome was evaluated following the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle score. All data were assessed by two physicians blind to clinical assessments. The wound healed primarily in three cases. The bone got solid union without refracture and malunion. The distraction time was 30 days (range, 25-45 days). The fixation time was 113.3 days (average, 80-150 days). Calcaneal lengthening was 26 mm (range, 15-43 mm). The height and length of the calcaneus were restored nearly to the same as the opposite foot. The mean preoperative calcaneal pitch angle increased from 2.6 degrees to an average of 19.0 degrees after the surgery. The AOFAS score increased from 60.0 to 86.0. One patient experienced pin infection. The infection healed after changing the dressing. Calcaneal lengthening using an Ilizarov external fixator is a preferable technique to restore the length and height of the calcaneus and can achieve satisfactory foot function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.