ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2024
ECG classification via integration of adaptive beat segmentation and relative heart rate with deep learning networks.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An enhanced hypergraph CNN with adaptive focal loss for automated ECG heartbeat classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multiclass Arrhythmia Classification Using Multimodal Smartwatch Photoplethysmography Signals Collected in Real-Life Settings.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- QRS-centric beat-wise atrial fibrillation detection in ECG signals using deep neural networks.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- A two-stage deep learning framework for predicting the onset of Atrial fibrillation using RR interval-based embeddings.Biocybernetics and biomedical engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a state-of-the-art deep learning approach for accurate electrocardiogram (ECG) signal analysis, addressing both waveform delineation and beat type classification tasks. For beat type classification, we integrated two novel schemes into the deep learning model, significantly enhancing its performance. The first scheme is an adaptive beat segmentation method that determines the optimal duration for each heartbeat based on RR-intervals, mitigating segmenting errors from conventional fixed-period segmentation. The second scheme incorporates relative heart rate information of the target beat compared to neighboring beats, improving the model's ability to accurately detect premature atrial contractions (PACs) that are easily confused with normal beats due to similar morphology. Extensive evaluations on the PhysioNet QT Database, MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database, and real-world wearable device data demonstrated the proposed approach's superior capabilities over existing methods in both tasks. The proposed approach achieved sensitivities of 99.81% for normal beats, 99.08% for premature ventricular contractions, and 97.83% for PACs in beat type classification. For waveform delineation, we achieved F1-scores of 0.9842 for non-waveform, 0.9798 for P-waves, 0.9749 for QRS complexes, and 0.9848 for T-waves. It significantly outperforms existing methods in PAC detection while maintaining high performance across both tasks. The integration of aforementioned two schemes into the deep learning model improved the accuracy of normal sinus rhythms and arrhythmia detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.