Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39205286›Full record

ReviewViruses2024

Transcription of Endogenous Retroviruses: Broad and Precise Mechanisms of Control.

Abigail S Jarosz, Julia V Halo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ERVK activity in CD8Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abigail S JaroszScience and Mathematics Division, Lorrain County Community College, Lorrain, OH 44035, USA.
Julia V HaloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-4697

Funding

Impact of endogenous retroviruses in the domestic dogR15GM154237 · NIGMS · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HALO, JULIA VERA · 2024 to 2024
$426k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM154237NIH HHS 1R15GM154237-24A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are the remnants of retroviral germline infections and are highly abundant in the genomes of vertebrates. At one time considered to be nothing more than inert 'junk' within genomes, ERVs have been tolerated within host genomes over vast timescales, and their study continues to reveal complex co-evolutionary histories within their respective host species. For example, multiple instances have been characterized of ERVs having been 'borrowed' for normal physiology, from single copies to ones involved in various regulatory networks such as innate immunity and during early development. Within the cell, the accessibility of ERVs is normally tightly controlled by epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation or histone modifications. However, these silencing mechanisms of ERVs are reversible, and epigenetic alterations to the chromatin landscape can thus lead to their aberrant expression, as is observed in abnormal cellular environments such as in tumors. In this review, we focus on ERV transcriptional control and draw parallels and distinctions concerning the loss of regulation in disease, as well as their precise regulation in early development.

Indexed as

Endogenous RetrovirusesEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, ViralHumansRetroviridae InfectionsTranscription, GeneticViral Transcriptionchromatinco-evolutionDuxembryogenesisendogenous retrovirus (ERV)KRAB-ZFPlong terminal repeat (LTR)pluripotencyviral mimicry

Identifiers

PMID39205286
PMCPMC11359688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.