ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Independent Vector Analysis for Feature Extraction in Motor Imagery Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG Feature Extraction and Classification for Upper Limb Flexion and Extension Motor Imagery Based on Discriminative Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- A Privacy-Preserving Markov Chain-Based Framework for Robust Motor Imagery EEG Classification in Brain-Computer Interfaces.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Independent vector analysis (IVA) can be viewed as an extension of independent component analysis (ICA) to multiple datasets. It exploits the statistical dependency between different datasets through mutual information. In the context of motor imagery classification based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals for the brain-computer interface (BCI), several methods have been proposed to extract features efficiently, mainly based on common spatial patterns, filter banks, and deep learning. However, most methods use only one dataset at a time, which may not be sufficient for dealing with a multi-source retrieving problem in certain scenarios. From this perspective, this paper proposes an original approach for feature extraction through multiple datasets based on IVA to improve the classification of EEG-based motor imagery movements. The IVA components were used as features to classify imagined movements using consolidated classifiers (support vector machines and K-nearest neighbors) and deep classifiers (EEGNet and EEGInception). The results show an interesting performance concerning the clustering of MI-based BCI patients, and the proposed method reached an average accuracy of 86.7%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.