ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Advanced Sensing System for Sleep Bruxism across Multiple Postures via EMG and Machine Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Bruxism Detection: A Technical Pipeline Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Neuromuscular Responses of the Cranio-Cervico-Mandibular System During Professional "110th Targa Florio" Rally Competitions: An Electromyographic Study in Real-World Racing Conditions.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Self-Induced Scratch Intensity Detection Using Feature Optimization and Multi-Channel Electromyogram Signals for Prevention of Lichenification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Hemodynamic Monitoring of Simulated Bruxism Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Application of Additive Manufacturing and Deep Learning in Exercise State Discrimination.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosis of bruxism is challenging because not all contractions of the masticatory muscles can be classified as bruxism. Conventional methods for sleep bruxism detection vary in effectiveness. Some provide objective data through EMG, ECG, or EEG; others, such as dental implants, are less accessible for daily practice. These methods have targeted the masseter as the key muscle for bruxism detection. However, it is important to consider that the temporalis muscle is also active during bruxism among masticatory muscles. Moreover, studies have predominantly examined sleep bruxism in the supine position, but other anatomical positions are also associated with sleep. In this research, we have collected EMG data to detect the maximum voluntary contraction of the temporalis and masseter muscles in three primary anatomical positions associated with sleep, i.e., supine and left and right lateral recumbent positions. A total of 10 time domain features were extracted, and six machine learning classifiers were compared, with random forest outperforming others. The models achieved better accuracies in the detection of sleep bruxism with the temporalis muscle. An accuracy of 93.33% was specifically found for the left lateral recumbent position among the specified anatomical positions. These results indicate a promising direction of machine learning in clinical applications, facilitating enhanced diagnosis and management of sleep bruxism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.