ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of Hand-Crafted Feature Extraction for Fault Diagnosis in Rotating Machinery: A Survey.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dynamic rough set learning for reliable early warning in industrial time-series systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-scale entropy analysis of acoustic emission for gearbox fault severity classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Electric torque for fault severity diagnosis in gearbox-type load: ML approaches based on Poincaré plot and statistical features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Low-Cost IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance Using Vibration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hybrid Diagnostic Framework for Interpretable Bearing Fault Classification Using CNN and Dual-Stage Feature Selection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing three-phase induction motor reliability with health index and artificial intelligence-driven predictive maintenance.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive collection of formulas and calculations for hand-crafted feature extraction of condition monitoring signals. The documented features include 123 for the time domain and 46 for the frequency domain. Furthermore, a machine learning-based methodology is presented to evaluate the performance of features in fault classification tasks using seven data sets of different rotating machines. The evaluation methodology involves using seven ranking methods to select the best ten hand-crafted features per method for each database, to be subsequently evaluated by three types of classifiers. This process is applied exhaustively by evaluation groups, combining our databases with an external benchmark. A summary table of the performance results of the classifiers is also presented, including the percentage of classification and the number of features required to achieve that value. Through graphic resources, it has been possible to show the prevalence of certain features over others, how they are associated with the database, and the order of importance assigned by the ranking methods. In the same way, finding which features have the highest appearance percentages for each database in all experiments has been possible. The results suggest that hand-crafted feature extraction is an effective technique with low computational cost and high interpretability for fault identification and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.