Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39205019›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

50 Hz Temporal Magnetic Field Monitoring from High-Voltage Power Lines: Sensor Design and Experimental Validation.

Kenneth Deprez, Tom Van de Steene, Leen Verloock, Emmeric Tanghe, Liesbeth Gommé, Mart Verlaek, Michel Goethals, Karen van Campenhout, David Plets, Wout Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kenneth DeprezDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec WAVES, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1954-6738
Tom Van de SteeneDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec WAVES, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3636-8144
Leen VerloockDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec WAVES, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-3481
Emmeric TangheDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec WAVES, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0020-6466
Liesbeth GomméDepartment of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0000-4718-1994
Mart VerlaekDepartment of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Michel GoethalsDepartment of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Karen van CampenhoutDepartment of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
David PletsDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec WAVES, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8879-5076
Wout JosephDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec WAVES, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-0673

Funding

The department of Environment & Spatial Development Flanders OMG-VPO/2021/004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A low-cost, tri-axial 50 Hz magnetic field monitoring sensor was designed, calibrated and verified. The sensor was designed using off-the-shelf components and commercially available coils. It can measure 50 Hz magnetic fields originating from high-voltage power lines from 0.08 µT to 364 µT, divided into two measurement ranges. The sensor was calibrated both on-board and in-lab. The on-board calibration takes the circuit attenuation, noise and parasitic components into account. In the in-lab calibration, the output of the developed sensor is compared to the benchmark, a narrowband EHP-50. The sensor was then verified in situ under high-voltage power lines at two independent measurement locations. The measured field values during this validation were between 0.10 µT and 13.43 µT, which is in agreement with other reported measurement values under high-voltage power lines in literature. The results were compared to the benchmark, for which average deviations of 6.2% and 1.4% were found, at the two independent measurement locations. Furthermore, fields up to 113.3 µT were measured in a power distribution sub-station to ensure that both measurement ranges were verified. Our network, four active sensors in the field, had high uptimes of 96%, 82%, 81% and, 95% during a minimum 3-month interval. In total, over 6 million samples were gathered with field values that ranged from 0.08 µT to 45.48 µT. This suggests that the proposed solution can be used for this monitoring, although more extensive long-term testing with more sensors is required to confirm the uptime under multiple circumstances.

Indexed as

electromagnetic field (EMF)extremely low frequency (ELF)magnetic field exposure sensormonitoring sensor

Identifiers

PMID39205019
PMCPMC11487399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.