ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Quality Assessment and Application Scenario Analysis of AGRI Land Aerosol Product from the Geostationary Satellite Fengyun-4B in China.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) sensor on board the geostationary satellite Fengyun-4B (FY-4B) is capable of capturing particles in different phases in the atmospheric environment and acquiring aerosol observation data with high spatial and temporal resolution. To understand the quality of the Land Aerosol (LDA) product of AGRI and its application prospects, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the AGRI LDA AOD. Using the 550 nm AGRI LDA AOD (550 nm) of nearly 1 year (1 October 2022 to 30 September 2023) to compare with the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET), MODIS MAIAC, and Himawari-9/AHI AODs. Results show the erratic algorithmic performance of AGRI LDA AOD, the correlation coefficient (R), mean error (Bias), root mean square error (RMSE), and the percentage of data with errors falling within the expected error envelope of ±(0.05+0.15×AODAERONET) (within EE15) of the LDA AOD dataset are 0.55, 0.328, 0.533, and 34%, respectively. The LDA AOD appears to be overestimated easily in the southern and western regions of China and performs poorly in the offshore areas, with an R of 0.43, a Bias of 0.334, a larger RMSE of 0.597, and a global climate observing system fraction (GCOSF) percentage of 15% compared to the inland areas (R = 0.60, Bias = 0.163, RMSE = 0.509, GCOSF = 17%). Future improvements should focus on surface reflectance calculation, water vapor attenuation, and more suitable aerosol model selection to improve the algorithm's accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.