Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39204871›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploratory Analysis Using Deep Learning for Water-Body Segmentation of Peru's High-Mountain Remote Sensing Images.

William Isaac Perez-Torres, Diego Armando Uman-Flores, Andres Benjamin Quispe-Quispe, Facundo Palomino-Quispe, Emili Bezerra, Quefren Leher, Thuanne Paixão, Ana Beatriz Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William Isaac Perez-TorresLIECAR Laboratory, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco (UNSAAC), Cusco 08003, Peru.ORCID 0009-0005-5379-5008
Diego Armando Uman-FloresLIECAR Laboratory, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco (UNSAAC), Cusco 08003, Peru.ORCID 0009-0005-7177-7970
Andres Benjamin Quispe-QuispeLIECAR Laboratory, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco (UNSAAC), Cusco 08003, Peru.ORCID 0009-0001-2854-9922
Facundo Palomino-QuispeLIECAR Laboratory, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco (UNSAAC), Cusco 08003, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-6682
Emili BezerraPAVIC Laboratory, University of Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco 69915-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4519-8332
Quefren LeherPAVIC Laboratory, University of Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco 69915-900, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-6678-1131
Thuanne PaixãoPAVIC Laboratory, University of Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco 69915-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-8971
Ana Beatriz AlvarezPAVIC Laboratory, University of Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco 69915-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3403-8261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-mountain water bodies represent critical components of their ecosystems, serving as vital freshwater reservoirs, environmental regulators, and sentinels of climate change. To understand the environmental dynamics of these regions, comprehensive analyses of lakes across spatial and temporal scales are necessary. While remote sensing offers a powerful tool for lake monitoring, applications in high-mountain terrain present unique challenges. The Ancash and Cuzco regions of the Peruvian Andes exemplify these challenges. These regions harbor numerous high-mountain lakes, which are crucial for fresh water supply and environmental regulation. This paper presents an exploratory examination of remote sensing techniques for lake monitoring in the Ancash and Cuzco regions of the Peruvian Andes. The study compares three deep learning models for lake segmentation: the well-established DeepWaterMapV2 and WatNet models and the adapted WaterSegDiff model, which is based on a combination of diffusion and transformation mechanisms specifically conditioned for lake segmentation. In addition, the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) with Otsu thresholding is used for comparison purposes. To capture lakes across these regions, a new dataset was created with Landsat-8 multispectral imagery (bands 2-7) from 2013 to 2023. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed using metrics such as Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU), Pixel Accuracy (PA), and F1 Score. The results achieved indicate equivalent performance of DeepWaterMapV2 and WatNet encoder-decoder architectures, achieving adequate lake segmentation despite the challenging geographical and atmospheric conditions inherent in high-mountain environments. In the qualitative analysis, the behavior of the WaterSegDiff model was considered promising for the proposed application. Considering that WatNet is less computationally complex, with 3.4 million parameters, this architecture becomes the most pertinent to implement. Additionally, a detailed temporal analysis of Lake Singrenacocha in the Vilcanota Mountains was conducted, pointing out the more significant behavior of the WatNet model.

Indexed as

deep learninghigh-mountain ecosystemPeruremote sensingsatellite imagerywater body segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39204871
PMCPMC11360623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.