ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Driving Attention State Detection Based on GRU-EEGNet.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Driver Attention Detection in Complex Driving Environments via Binocular Depth Compensation and Multi-Source Temporal Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Classifying metro drivers' cognitive distractions during manual operations using machine learning and random forest-recursive feature elimination.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study utilizes the significant differences in θ, α, and β band power spectra observed in electroencephalograms (EEGs) during distracted versus focused driving. Three subtasks, visual distraction, auditory distraction, and cognitive distraction, were designed to appear randomly during driving simulations. The θ, α, and β band power spectra of the EEG signals of the four driving attention states were extracted, and SVM, EEGNet, and GRU-EEGNet models were employed for the detection of the driving attention states, respectively. Online experiments were conducted. The extraction of the θ, α, and β band power spectrum features of the EEG signals was found to be a more effective method than the extraction of the power spectrum features of the whole EEG signals for the detection of driving attention states. The driving attention state detection accuracy of the proposed GRU-EEGNet model is improved by 6.3% and 12.8% over the EEGNet model and PSD_SVM method, respectively. The EEG decoding method combining EEG features and an improved deep learning algorithm, which effectively improves the driving attention state detection accuracy, was manually and preliminarily selected based on the results of existing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.