ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Research on the Method for Recognizing Bulk Grain-Loading Status Based on LiDAR.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grain is a common bulk cargo. To ensure optimal utilization of transportation space and prevent overflow accidents, it is necessary to observe the grain's shape and determine the loading status during the loading process. Traditional methods often rely on manual judgment, which results in high labor intensity, poor safety, and low loading efficiency. Therefore, this paper proposes a method for recognizing the bulk grain-loading status based on Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). This method uses LiDAR to obtain point cloud data and constructs a deep learning network to perform target recognition and component segmentation on loading vehicles, extract vehicle positions and grain shapes, and recognize and make known the bulk grain-loading status. Based on the measured point cloud data of bulk grain loading, in the point cloud-classification task, the overall accuracy is 97.9% and the mean accuracy is 98.1%. In the vehicle component-segmentation task, the overall accuracy is 99.1% and the Mean Intersection over Union is 96.6%. The results indicate that the method has reliable performance in the research tasks of extracting vehicle positions, detecting grain shapes, and recognizing loading status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.