ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Affordable 3D Orientation Visualization Solution for Working Class Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV).
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ROV operators often encounter challenges with orientation awareness while operating underwater, primarily due to relying solely on 2D camera feeds to manually control the ROV robot arm. This limitation in underwater visibility and orientation awareness, as observed among Malaysian ROV operators, can compromise the accuracy of arm placement, and pose a risk of tool damage if not handle with care. To address this, a 3D orientation monitoring system for ROVs has been developed, leveraging measurement sensors with nine degrees of freedom (DOF). These sensors capture crucial parameters such as roll, pitch, yaw, and heading, providing real-time data on the ROV's position along the X, Y, and Z axes to ensure precise orientation. These data are then utilized to generate and process 3D imaging and develop a corresponding 3D model of the operational ROV underwater, accurately reflecting its orientation in a visual representation by using an open-source platform. Due to constraints set by an agreement with the working class ROV operators, only short-term tests (up to 1 min) could be performed at the dockyard. A video demonstration of a working class ROV replica moving and reflecting in a 3D simulation in real-time was also presented. Despite these limitations, our findings demonstrate the feasibility and potential of a cost-effective 3D orientation visualization system for working class ROVs. With mean absolute error (MAE) error less than 2%, the results align with the performance expectations of the actual working ROV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.