ReviewPolymers2024
Rheological Characteristics of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers as Viscoelastic Substances.
Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Safety of a Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid Plus Mannitol Filler for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Subjects: A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Study.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Trial
- Twelve-Month Outcome of Nasolabial Fold Correction by a Novel Non-1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether, Click-Crosslinked, Long-Chain Hyaluronic Acid Product.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Trial
- Concentration-Dependent Rheological Properties of Atelocollagen Are Associated with Fibroblast Mechanotransduction and Collagen Remodeling in Aged Skin.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Translating a Preclinical Hydrogel Platform into a Human Therapeutic for Delivering Targeted Low-Dose Anti-CTLA-4.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of Orofacial Function After Mandibular Angle Harmonization with Hyaluronic Acid: A Longitudinal Observational Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Late-Onset Upper Eyelid Edema Following Temporal Hollow Correction With Hyaluronic Acid.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Unveiling the rheological secrets of hydrogels: from lab to clinical translation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Rheological and Physicochemical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Body Contouring: Clinical Implications and Anatomical Considerations.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Perceived User Experience, Comfort, and Ergonomics of an Add-on Backstop for Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections: A Simulated-Use Study in Aesthetic Healthcare Professionals.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Investigation of Vibration-Induced Transport of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluids in Porous Media Using Lattice Boltzmann Method.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Physicochemical Characterization of Polylactic Acid-Based Dermal Fillers.Polymers · 2025Article
- Modulating rheology and bioactivity in dermal fillers: the emerging role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are widely used in esthetic medicine and are categorized into biphasic and monophasic types based on their manufacturing processes. To evaluate the quality of these fillers, it is essential to understand their rheological properties, which reflect their viscoelastic nature. Rheology, the study of material deformation and flow, reveals how fillers behave under stress, combining properties of solids and liquids. This study explores the fundamental principles of elasticity and viscosity, rooted in Hooke's law of elasticity and Newton's law of viscosity, to explain the complex behavior of viscoelastic substances like HA fillers. The distinction between biphasic and monophasic fillers lies in their chemical cross-linking processes, which impact their molecular weight, structure, and ultimately, their clinical performance. Biphasic fillers with minimal cross-linking rely on natural molecular entanglements, exhibiting lower modification efficiency and greater elasticity. Conversely, monophasic fillers, which undergo extensive chemical cross-linking, demonstrate higher modification efficiency, firmer texture, and enhanced resistance to enzymatic degradation. The study emphasizes the importance of thoroughly removing residual cross-linking agents to ensure filler safety. Understanding these rheological characteristics aids clinicians in selecting appropriate fillers based on injection sites, tissue conditions, and desired outcomes, balancing viscoelastic properties and safety for optimal esthetic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.