ArticlePolymers2024
Investigation of Delamination Characteristics in 3D-Printed Hybrid Curved Composite Beams.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on understanding the impact of different material compositions and printing parameters on the structural integrity of hybrid curved composite beams. Using the continuous filament fabrication technique, which is an advanced fused deposition modelling process, composite curved beams made of short carbon and various continuous fibre-reinforced nylon laminae were fabricated and subjected to four-point bending tests to assess their delamination characteristics. The results show that the presence of five flat zones in the curved region of a curved beam achieves 10% and 6% increases in maximum load and delamination strength, respectively, against a smooth curved region. The delamination response of a curved composite beam design consisting of unidirectional carbon/nylon laminae is superior to that of a curved beam made of glass fibre/nylon laminae, while the existence of highly strengthened glass fibre bundles is alternatively quite competitive. Doubling the number of continuous fibre-reinforced laminae results in an increase of up to 36% in strength by achieving a total increase in the beam thickness of 50%, although increases in mass and material cost are serious concerns. The hybrid curved beam design has a decrease in the maximum load and the strength by 11% and 13%, respectively, when compared with a non-hybrid design, which consists of some type of stronger and stiffer nylon laminae instead of short carbon fibre-reinforced conventional nylon laminae. Two-dimensional surface-based cohesive finite element models, which have a good agreement with experimental results, were also established for searching for the availability of useful virtual testing. The results from this study will greatly contribute to the design and numerical modelling of additively manufactured hybrid composite curved beams, brackets, and fittings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.