ReviewPharmaceutics2024
Drug-Loaded Bioscaffolds for Osteochondral Regeneration.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topographical design principles for osteochondral tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for lung cancer: bibliometric and visualized analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Innovative Hydroxyapatite-Hydrogel Composites for Cartilage Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smart functionalized cartilage repair microspheres: Concepts and applications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Design Strategies to Target Joint Resident Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteochondral Regeneration.Cells · 2026Review
- Design and Applications of Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteochondral defect is a complex tissue loss disease caused by arthritis, high-energy trauma, and many other reasons. Due to the unique structural characteristics of osteochondral tissue, the repair process is sophisticated and involves the regeneration of both hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone. However, the current clinical treatments often fall short of achieving the desired outcomes. Tissue engineering bioscaffolds, especially those created via three-dimensional (3D) printing, offer promising solutions for osteochondral defects due to their precisely controllable 3D structures. The microstructure of 3D-printed bioscaffolds provides an excellent physical environment for cell adhesion and proliferation, as well as nutrient transport. Traditional 3D-printed bioscaffolds offer mere physical stimulation, while drug-loaded 3D bioscaffolds accelerate the tissue repair process by synergistically combining drug therapy with physical stimulation. In this review, the physiological characteristics of osteochondral tissue and current treatments of osteochondral defect were reviewed. Subsequently, the latest progress in drug-loaded bioscaffolds was discussed and highlighted in terms of classification, characteristics, and applications. The perspectives of scaffold design, drug control release, and biosafety were also discussed. We hope this article will serve as a valuable reference for the design and development of osteochondral regenerative bioscaffolds and pave the way for the use of drug-loaded bioscaffolds in clinical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.