ArticlePharmaceutics2024
Three-Dimensional Printing of PVA Capsular Devices for Applications in Compounding Pharmacy: Effect of Design Parameters on Pharmaceutical Performance.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The creation of products with personalized or innovative features in the pharmaceutical sector by using innovative technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) printing is particularly noteworthy, especially in the realm of compounding pharmacies. In this work, 3D printed capsule devices (CDs) with different wall thicknesses (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.9 mm) and sizes were designed and successfully fabricated varying printing parameters such as extrusion temperature, printing speed, material flow percent, and nozzle diameter. The physicochemical, pharmaceutical, and biopharmaceutical performance of these CDs was evaluated with the aim of achieving an immediate drug release profile comparable to hard gelatin capsules (HGC) for use in magistral compounding. It was observed that the disintegration time of the CDs increased with wall thickness, which correlated with a slower drug release rate. CDs with configurations presenting 0.4 mm wall thickness and sizes comparable to HGC n° 0, 1, and 2 demonstrated satisfactory weight uniformity, short disintegration times, and immediate drug release, indicating their potential as effective devices in future compounding pharmacy applications. In addition, a modified Weibull-type model was proposed that incorporates wall thickness as a new variable in predicting dissolution profiles. This model improves the process of selecting a specific wall thickness to achieve the desired dissolution rate within a specified time frame.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.